Journal
URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 1-14Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2022.2040980
Keywords
Infrastructure; governance; crisis; strategic planning; decolonisation
Funding
- Henry Halloran Trust
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article discusses the contradiction between urban infrastructure planning and implementation, highlighting the governance gaps in infrastructure decision-making and the importance of indigenous voices in these decisions.
Planning should deliver urban infrastructures that nurture places and people. However, the misalignment between strategic plans and delivered projects reveals critical governance gaps, with little clarity surrounding for whom and what ends infrastructures serve. This positioning piece proposes an infrastructure governance research agenda focused on the integration of planning, funding, and social legitimacy of projects, and the reality of multiple ongoing crises. Most importantly, the proposed research agenda calls for a First Nation voice at the heart of infrastructure decision-making as part of the planning profession's contribution to the Treaty process that Australia desperately needs to move forward.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available