3.9 Article

The Inclusive Professional Framework for Societies: Changing Mental Models to Promote Diverse, Equitable, and Inclusive STEM Systems Change

Journal

FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.784399

Keywords

inclusive professional framework for societies; mental models; intercultural mindfulness; equity mindset; inclusive relationships; identity awareness; influential actions; DEI (or Diversity Equity and Inclusion)

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [2017953, 1834518, 1834522, 1834510, 1834513, 1834526, 1834521]
  2. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1834526] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  4. Division Of Human Resource Development [1834518, 1834510, 1834521, 1834513] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Directorate for STEM Education [2017953] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Human Resource Development [1834526] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Human Resource Development
  8. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1834522] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Div. of Equity for Excellence in STEM [2017953] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics professional societies play a crucial role in promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion reform at the national level. By addressing mental models and implementing strategies, these societies can facilitate system change and enhance engagement of all STEM talent, leading to disciplinary excellence. The Inclusive Professional Framework for Societies (IPF: Societies) provides a comprehensive approach to address barriers hindering DEI reform and can be applied to various aspects of professional societies.
Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professional societies (ProSs) are uniquely positioned to foster national-level diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) reform. ProSs serve broad memberships, define disciplinary norms and culture, and inform accrediting bodies and thus provide critical levers for systems change. STEM ProSs could be instrumental in achieving the DEI system reform necessary to optimize engagement of all STEM talent, leveraging disciplinary excellence resulting from diverse teams. Inclusive STEM system reform requires that underlying mental models be examined. The Inclusive Professional Framework for Societies (IPF: Societies) is an interrelated set of strategies that can help ProSs change leaders (i.e., boundary spanners) and organizations identify and address mental models hindering DEI reform. The IPF: Societies uses four I's-Identity awareness and Intercultural mindfulness (i.e., equity mindset) upon which inclusive relationships and Influential DEI actions are scaffolded. We discuss how the IPF: Societies complements existing DEI tools (e.g., Women in Engineering ProActive Network's Framework for Promoting Gender Equity within Organization; Amplifying the Alliance to Catalyze Change for Equity in STEM Success' Equity Environmental Scan Tool). We explain how the IPF: Societies can be applied to existing ProS policy and practice associated with common ProS functions (e.g., leadership, membership, conferences, awards, and professional development). The next steps are to pilot the IPF: Societies with a cohort of STEM ProSs. Ultimately, the IPF: Societies has potential to promote more efficient, effective, and lasting DEI organizational transformation and contribute to inclusive STEM disciplinary excellence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available