4.8 Article

Superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelate La1-xCaxNiO2 thin films

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abl9927

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A* STAR) under its Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering (AME) Individual Research Grant (IRG) [A1983c0034]
  2. Ministry of Education (MOE) of Singapore [T2EP50121-0039]
  3. Singapore National Research Foundation (NRF) under the Competitive Research Programs (CRP) [NRF-CRP15-2015-01]
  4. SSLS via NUS [C-380-003-003-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Superconductivity is observed in infinite-layer Ca-doped LaNiO2 thin films and their phase diagram is constructed. Unlike other nickelates, the undoped and underdoped films are entirely insulating, while a superconducting dome is observed in the overdoped regime. The Hall coefficient also changes at low temperature for highly doped samples.
We report the observation of superconductivity in infinite-layer Ca-doped LaNiO2 (La1-xCaxNiO2) thin films and construct their phase diagram. Unlike the metal-insulator transition in Nd- and Pr-based nickelates, the undoped and underdoped La1-xCaxNiO2 thin films are entirely insulating from 300 K down to 2 K. A superconducting dome is observed at 0.15 < x < 0.3 with weakly insulating behavior at the overdoped regime. Moreover, the sign of the Hall coefficient R-H changes at low temperature for samples with a higher doping level. However, distinct from the Nd- and Pr-based nickelates, the R-H-sign-change temperature remains at around 35 K as the doping increases, which begs further theoretical and experimental investigation to reveal the role of the 4f orbital to the (multi) band nature of the superconducting nickelates. Our results also emphasize a notable role of lattice correlation on the multiband structures of the infinite-layer nickelates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available