4.5 Review

Are Non-Contact Thermometers an Option in Anaesthesia? A Narrative Review on Thermometry for Perioperative Medicine

Journal

HEALTHCARE
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10020219

Keywords

thermometry; thermometers; perioperative medicine; anaesthesia; infrared thermometer; contact thermometer; non-contact thermometer; body temperature; temperature; COVID-19

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the importance of temperature measurement during perioperative care and compares the practicality and accuracy of traditional contact thermometers with non-invasive infrared thermometers used for population screening during a pandemic. Current evidence shows that the accuracy and practicality of contact thermometry vary depending on the measurement site and method of sterilization or disposal. Infrared thermometry used for perioperative medicine lacks the required accuracy, which may be due to uncontrolled external temperatures, patient actions, measurement distance, and different measurement sites.
Measurement of core body temperature-clinical thermometry-provides critical information to anaesthetists during perioperative care. The value of this information is determined by the accuracy of the measurement device used. This accuracy must be maintained despite external influences such as the operating room temperature and the patient's thermoregulatory defence. Presently, perioperative thermometers utilise invasive measurement sites. The public health challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, has highlighted the use of non-invasive, non-contact infrared thermometers. The aim of this article is to review common existing thermometers used in perioperative care, their mechanisms of action, accuracy, and practicality in comparison to infrared non-contact thermometry used for population screening during a pandemic. Evidence currently shows that contact thermometry varies in accuracy and practicality depending on the site of measurements and the method of sterilisation or disposal between uses. Despite the benefits of being a non-invasive and non-contact device, infrared thermometry used for population temperature screening lacks the accuracy required in perioperative medicine. Inaccuracy may be a consequence of uncontrolled external temperatures, the patient's actions prior to measurement, distance between the patient and the thermometer, and the different sites of measurement. A re-evaluation of non-contact thermometry is recommended, requiring new studies in more controlled environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available