4.5 Article

Impact of the Process Variables on the Yield of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate

Journal

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9020057

Keywords

bone marrow; bone marrow aspirate concentrate; mesenchymal stromal cells

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2019R1I1A1A01061296, NRF-2021R1I1A1A01040732]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human bone marrow is a promising source of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for regenerative procedures involving cartilage and bone. However, the low proportion of MSCs in the bone marrow requires careful harvesting and processing techniques. There is currently a lack of consensus regarding the variables in the harvesting and processing technique of bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) and their impact on MSC yield.
Human bone marrow (BM) has been highlighted as a promising source of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) containing various growth factors and cytokines that can be potentially utilized in regenerative procedures involving cartilage and bone. However, the proportion of MSCs in the nucleated cell population of BM is only around 0.001% to 0.01% thereby making the harvesting and processing technique crucial for obtaining optimal results upon its use in various regenerative processes. Although several studies in the literature have given encouraging results on the utility of BM aspiration concentrate (BMAC) in various regenerative procedures, there is a lack of consensus concerning the harvesting variables such as choice of anesthetic agent to be used, site of harvest, size of the syringe to be used, anticoagulant of choice, and processing variables such as centrifugation time, and speed. In this review article, we aim to discuss the variables in the harvesting and processing technique of BMAC and their impact on the yield of MSCs in the final concentrate obtained from them.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available