4.5 Article

Elevated Arsenic and Uranium Concentrations in Unregulated Water Sources on the Navajo Nation, USA

Journal

EXPOSURE AND HEALTH
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 113-124

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12403-016-0226-6

Keywords

Unregulated water sources; Arsenic; Uranium; Inorganic chemical mixtures

Funding

  1. National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences [RO1 ES014565, R25 ES013208, P30 ES-012072]
  2. NIGMS ASERT IRACDA postdoctoral fellowship [K12 GM088021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regional water pollution and use of unregulated water sources can be an important mixed metals exposure pathway for rural populations located in areas with limited water infrastructure and an extensive mining history. Using censored data analysis and mapping techniques we analyzed the joint geospatial distribution of arsenic and uranium in unregulated water sources throughout the Navajo Nation, where over 500 abandoned uranium mine sites are located in the rural southwestern United States. Results indicated that arsenic and uranium concentrations exceeded national drinking water standards in 15.1 % (arsenic) and 12.8 % (uranium) of tested water sources. Unregulated sources in close proximity (i.e., within 6 km) to abandoned uranium mines yielded significantly higher concentrations of arsenic or uranium than more distant sources. The demonstrated regional trends for potential co-exposure to these chemicals have implications for public policy and future research. Specifically, to generate solutions that reduce human exposure to water pollution from unregulated sources in rural areas, the potential for co-exposure to arsenic and uranium requires expanded documentation and examination. Recommendations for prioritizing policy and research decisions related to the documentation of existing health exposures and risk reduction strategies are also provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available