4.7 Article

A new approach to simulate peat accumulation, degradation and stability in a global land surface scheme (JULES vn5.8_accumulate_soil) for northern and temperate peatlands

Journal

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 1633-1657

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-15-1633-2022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/R015791/1, NE/1012915, NE/S001166/1]
  2. European Research Council [865403]
  3. Joint UK BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]
  4. Maj ja Tor Nessling Foundation [202000476]
  5. NERC [NE/R015791/1, NE/S001166/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [865403] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peatlands have been often neglected in Earth system models (ESMs) due to the inability to capture the continuous spectrum of soil types and their dynamic nature. In this study, a new model scheme is proposed to integrate soil organic matter accumulation and peatland processes, and to track soil carbon age. The new scheme demonstrates the potential for peatlands to rewet themselves following drainage and maintain stability in the model. The evaluation results show that the new model produces realistic profiles of soil organic carbon for peatlands.
Peatlands have often been neglected in Earth system models (ESMs). Where they are included, they are usually represented via a separate, prescribed grid cell fraction that is given the physical characteristics of a peat (highly organic) soil. However, in reality soils vary on a spectrum between purely mineral soil (no organic material) and purely organic soil, typically with an organic layer of variable thickness overlying mineral soil below. They are also dynamic, with organic layer thickness and its properties changing over time. Neither the spectrum of soil types nor their dynamic nature can be captured by current ESMs. Here we present a new version of an ESM land surface scheme (Joint UK Land Environment Simulator, JULES) where soil organic matter accumulation - and thus peatland formation, degradation and stability - is integrated in the vertically resolved soil carbon scheme. We also introduce the capacity to track soil carbon age as a function of depth in JULES and compare this to measured peat age-depth profiles. The new scheme is tested and evaluated at northern and temperate sites. This scheme simulates dynamic feedbacks between the soil organic material and its thermal and hydraulic characteristics. We show that draining the peatlands can lead to significant carbon loss, soil compaction and changes in peat properties. However, negative feedbacks can lead to the potential for peatlands to rewet themselves following drainage. These ecohydrological feedbacks can also lead to peatlands maintaining themselves in climates where peat formation would not otherwise initiate in the model, i.e. displaying some degree of resilience. The new model produces similar results to the original model for mineral soils and realistic profiles of soil organic carbon for peatlands. We evaluate the model against typical peat profiles based on 216 northern and temperate sites from a global dataset of peat cores. The root-mean-squared error (RMSE) in the soil carbon profile is reduced by 35 %-80 % in the best-performing JULES-Peat simulations compared with the standard JULES configuration. The RMSE in these JULES-Peat simulations is 7.7-16.7 kg C M-3 depending on climate zone, which is considerably smaller than the soil carbon itself (around 30-60 kg C m(-3)). The RMSE at mineral soil sites is also reduced in JULES-Peat compared with the original JULES configuration (reduced by similar to 30 %50 %). Thus, JULES-Peat can be used as a complete scheme that simulates both organic and mineral soils. It does not require any additional input data and introduces minimal additional variables to the model. This provides a new approach for improving the simulation of organic and peatland soils and associated carbon-cycle feedbacks in ESMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available