4.5 Article

Morphology and Wear Behavior of Monolayer TiAlN and Composite AlCrN/TiAlN-Coated Plasma-Nitrided DAC-10 Tool Steel

Journal

ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 15519-15538

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-022-06711-x

Keywords

DAC-10 tool steel; SAPH370 steel; Coatings; Nanoindentation; Friction and wear; Adhesion

Funding

  1. TEQIP-III, National Institute of Technology Silchar (Assam, India)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the AlCrN/TiAlN composite coating performed better in terms of surface roughness, hardness, and wear resistance, and showed a lower wear rate in nanoindentation and tribological tests.
This experimental study focuses on the comparison of a monolayer of titanium-aluminum-nitride (TiAlN) and a composite of AlCrN/TiAlN coating where aluminum-chromium-nitride (AlCrN) deposited as an interlayer. These coatings have been deposited over heat-treated and plasma-nitrided DAC-10 tool steel using the physical vapor deposition (PVD) technique. Under this study, surface morphology, structural, nanomechanical, and wear behavior of these coated surfaces have been compared. Results suggest that surface roughness of bare nitrided DAC-10 tool steel decreased drastically and nanomechanical properties improved significantly upon coating. AlCrN/TiAlN coating exhibits a high strain hardening exponent (n) value which indicates lower maximum penetration depth and pile-up formation during nanoindentation, it also validates that AlCrN/TiAlN-coated surface comprises high hardness. The wear mechanisms of both the surfaces have been observed under FE-SEM with EDS; it reveals that severe adhesion of SAPH370 steel ball and heavy oxidation on both the coated surface. Even so, with high average arithmetic mean height and nanomechanical properties, AlCrN/TiAlN-coated surface performed better under nanoindentation and tribological test and it also reveals a lower wear rate under dry sliding conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available