4.6 Article

Healthcare utilization and costs following non-fatal powdered and non-powdered firearm injuries for children and youth

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 181, Issue 6, Pages 2329-2342

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-022-04429-4

Keywords

Firearms; Injury; Costs; Pediatrics; Youth; Guns; Violence; Suicide; Trauma

Categories

Funding

  1. SickKids Foundation [6100100444]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Investigator Award [167905]
  3. ICES - Ontario Ministry of Health and Ministry of Long-term Care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little is known about the healthcare and economic burdens of non-fatal firearm injuries for children/youth beyond the initial admission. This study aimed to estimate the healthcare utilization and total direct healthcare costs of these injuries one year post-injury. The study found that children/youth who experienced powdered and non-powdered firearm injuries had higher healthcare utilization and costs compared to those who did not experience such injuries. The costs varied depending on the type of firearm and intent of the injury.
Little is known about the healthcare and economic burdens of non-fatal firearm injuries for children/youth beyond the initial admission. This study sought to estimate healthcare utilization and total direct healthcare costs of non-fatal powdered and non-powdered (air gun) firearm injuries 1-year post-injury. Using administrative data from 2003 to 2018 on all children/youth 0-24 years old in Ontario, Canada, a matched 1:2 cohort study was conducted to compare children/youth who experienced powdered and non-powdered firearm injuries with those who did not. Mean and median number of healthcare encounters and costs, and respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and interquartile ranges (IQRs), were estimated for both weapon type groups and controls and by intent. Children/youth who experienced a powdered and non-powdered firearm injury had a higher number of healthcare encounters and costs per year than those who did not. Mean 1-year costs for those with powdered and non-powdered firearm injuries were $8825 ($8007-$9643) and $2349 ($2118-$2578), respectively, versus $812 ($567-$1058) and $753 ($594-$911), respectively, for those without. Mean 1-year costs were highest for handgun injuries ($12,875 [95% CI $9941-$15,808]), and for intentional assault-related ($13,498 [$11,843-$15,153]; $3287 [$2213-$4362]), and intentional self-injuries ($14,773 [$6893-$22,652]; $6005 [$2193-$9817]) for both powdered and non-powdered firearm injuries, respectively. Conclusion: Firearm injuries have substantial healthcare and economic burdens beyond the initial injury-related admission; this should be accounted for when examining the overall impact of firearm injuries. What is Known: Child/youth firearm injuries have significant health and economic burdens. However, existing work has mainly examined healthcare utilization and costs of initial admissions and/or have been limited to single-center studies and no studies have provide cost estimates by weapon type and intent. What is New: Children/youth who suffered powdered firearm injuries had higher mean healthcare utilization and costs than those with non-powdered firearm injuries as well as comparable healthy children/youth. Mean 1-year costs were highest for handgun injuries ($12,875), and for intentional assault-related ($13,498; $3287), and intentional self-injuries ($14,773; $6005) for powdered and non-powdered firearm injuries, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available