4.6 Article

Analysis of Risk Factors Affecting Urban Truck Traffic Accident Severity in Korea

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14052901

Keywords

urban area; severity of truck traffic accident; regression analysis; traffic safety policy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes the severity of truck traffic accidents in Korea, identifying the driver, environmental, and traffic condition factors that contribute to the severity and proposing practical truck safety solutions. The study also finds that truck traffic accidents in logistics influencing areas are more likely to be serious.
Due to increases in truck traffic, truck traffic safety has become an unavoidable societal issue in Korea. Truck traffic accidents were responsible for 24% of all traffic deaths in 2019, and the fatality rate was significantly higher than that of other forms of traffic. This study analyzes not only the driver and environmental factors, but also the traffic condition factors which are considered to contribute to the severity of truck traffic accidents, and presents practical truck safety solutions based on the findings. This study examines the fatal and serious injury truck traffic accidents in Incheon, which has large logistics facilities and the highest fatality rate (3.3) in Korea's capital area. According to the regression analysis results, 'Nighttime', 'Vehicle-single', 'Vehicle to Pedestrian', 'Lane violation', and 'Signal violation' contribute to the severity of truck traffic accidents. Furthermore, truck traffic accidents in the logistics influencing area are more likely to be serious than in the non-influencing area. In terms of the traffic condition factors, the number of lanes, the maximum speed, and the number of road property-changing nodes were significant. The results of this study will provide useful data for establishing traffic safety policies in urban areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available