4.6 Article

Ultrafast charging and ultralong cycle life in solid-state Al-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 10, Issue 15, Pages 8178-8185

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta00630h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0702800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1837205]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT16ZD214, DUT19ZD101, DUT19JC32]
  4. University of Nebraska (Nebraska Research Initiative)
  5. Nebraska Center for Energy Science Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully designs and fabricates solid-state batteries with high-rate capability and long cycle life using a gel polymer electrolyte with ultrahigh ionic conductivity. The full batteries with the Al/GPE/3D graphene structure exhibit stability, high specific capacity, charging rate, and cycling stability under high current densities. Furthermore, high-flux operations play an important role in reducing energy demand during high-rate reactions.
Designing and fabricating solid-state batteries with high-rate capability and long cycle life remains a feat. Here, for the first time, a free-standing gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) that exhibits an ultrahigh ionic conductivity of 1.29 x 10(-2) S cm(-1) is used to regulate the charge transfer between the GPE and Al electrode. Full batteries with a structure of Al/GPE/3D graphene are proved to be stable under current densities from 20 to 200 A g(-1), by providing a specific capacity of 122 mA h g(-1), a charging rate up to 1000 A g(-1) (0.24 s charging time), and a stability over 20 000 cycles. High-flux operations are found to be essential in lowering the energy request during high-rate reactions: not only reducing the surge voltage, but also increasing the energy (237 W h kg(-1)@20 A g(-1)) and power density (469 kW kg(-1)@500 A g(-1)) in output (>17%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available