4.6 Article

Generating the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill qubit using a cross-Kerr interaction between squeezed light and Fock states in optics

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.022436

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JST (Moonshot RD) [JPMJMS2061, JPMJMS2064]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [20K15187]
  3. UTokyo Foundation
  4. Research Foundation for Opto-Science and Technology
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K15187] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a method to generate optical GKP qubits using cross-Kerr interaction and validates its feasibility through numerical calculations. The results show that the method is capable of generating GKP qubits with the required quality, achieving high fidelity and success probability.
The Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) qubit is a promising ingredient for fault-tolerant quantum computation (FTQC) in optical continuous variables due to its advantage of noise tolerance and scalability. However, one of the main problems in the preparation of the optical GKP qubit is the difficulty in obtaining the nonlinearity. Cross-Kerr interaction is one of the promising candidates for this nonlinearity. There is no existing scheme to use the cross-Kerr interaction to generate the optical GKP qubit for FTQC. In this work, we propose a generation method of the GKP qubit by using a cross-Kerr interaction between a squeezed light and a superposition of Fock states. We numerically show that the GKP qubit with the 10 dB can be generated with mean fidelities of 99.99 and 99.9% at the success probabilities of 2.7 and 4.8%, respectively. Therefore, our method has the potential to generate the optical GKP qubit with a quality required for FTQC when we obtain the sufficient technologies for the preparation of ancillary Fock states and a cross-Kerr interaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available