4.0 Article

μMatch: 3D Shape Correspondence for Biological Image Data

Journal

FRONTIERS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcomp.2022.777615

Keywords

bioimage analysis; shape quantification; correspondence; alignment; computational morphometry

Funding

  1. EMBL
  2. European Union [FP7-PEOPLE-2012-IIF 327382]
  3. Grup de Recerca Consolidat en Antropologia Biologica [2017 SGR 1630]
  4. ERC Advanced Grant SIMBIONT [670555]
  5. Spanish Plan Estatal project [LIMBNET-3D PID2019-110868GB-I00]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [670555] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modern microscopy technologies allow for 3D imaging of biological objects, enabling quantitative assessment of morphology. The mu Match pipeline introduces a state-of-the-art shape correspondence algorithm for soft-tissue objects without the need for landmarks, establishing correspondence in a fully automated manner.
Modern microscopy technologies allow imaging biological objects in 3D over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, opening the way for a quantitative assessment of morphology. However, establishing a correspondence between objects to be compared, a first necessary step of most shape analysis workflows, remains challenging for soft-tissue objects without striking features allowing them to be landmarked. To address this issue, we introduce the mu Match 3D shape correspondence pipeline. mu Match implements a state-of-the-art correspondence algorithm initially developed for computer graphics and packages it in a streamlined pipeline including tools to carry out all steps from input data pre-processing to classical shape analysis routines. Importantly, mu Match does not require any landmarks on the object surface and establishes correspondence in a fully automated manner. Our open-source method is implemented in Python and can be used to process collections of objects described as triangular meshes. We quantitatively assess the validity of mu Match relying on a well-known benchmark dataset and further demonstrate its reliability by reproducing published results previously obtained through manual landmarking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available