4.4 Article

Development of an Ecologically Valid Assessment for Social Cognition Based on Real Interaction: Preliminary Results

Journal

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bs12020054

Keywords

social cognition; emotional intelligence; emotion recognition; theory of mind

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed an applicable real interaction-based test to assess social cognition. The test showed high reliability and a stronger association with a more realistic video-based format compared to a less realistic paper-based format. This test can be used to assess social cognition in the general population.
Many social cognitive assessment measures that are appropriate for clinical use are currently available, but there is a general concern about their ecological validity. This study aimed to develop an applicable real interaction-based test to assess social cognition. A sample of 50 subjects (mean age 22 +/- 5.8, 56% women) took the Social Interaction Test as well as two instruments for assessing social cognition: (1) the Movie for Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC) and (2) branch 4 from the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT). The test showed no incidence on its application. The reliability of the 18-item final version of the test was a medium-high level (Cronbach's alpha = 0.701). To assess the internal structure of the test, a multidimensional scaling procedure was used. The common space of coordinates for the two-dimensional solution showed a normalized raw stress of 0.076 and Tucker's congruence coefficient of 0.965. The social interaction test showed stronger association with MASC (more realistic, video-based format) than with MSCEIT (less realistic, paper-based format). The Social Interaction Test is applicable and feasible to use it to assess social cognition in the general population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available