4.8 Article

A lava-inspired micro/nano-structured ceramifiable organic-inorganic hybrid fire-extinguishing coating

Journal

MATTER
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 911-932

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2021.12.009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Discovery Project [FT190100188, DP190102992, IC170100032]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51873196]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a lava-inspired fire-retardant coating composed of ceramic precursors, boron nitride nanosheets, and a fire-retardant polymer. The coating forms a noncombustible ceramic char layer similar to lava when exposed to flame, providing effective fire protection for various materials including foam, wood, and steel.
Fire-retardant coatings have demonstrated effective fire protection for various materials, ranging from flammable polymeric foam and wood to nonflammable steel. However, the poor cost effectiveness has significantly impeded their real-world applications. In nature, lava is a flowing, noncombustible molten liquid with a low thermal conductivity. We, herein, report a lava-inspired micro/nano-structured ceramifiable organic-inorganic hybrid coating comprising low-melting glass powders (GPs), such as ceramic precursors; boron nitride (BN) nanosheets as synergists; and a fire-retardant polymer as a coating base. Upon exposure to flame, the coating forms a lava-like noncombustible ceramic char layer that can serve as a robust fire shield for underlying substrates. The hybrid coating treated polyurethane foam exhibits a rapid self-extinguishing behavior and increased compressive strength, outperforming its previous counterparts. Meanwhile, the hybrid coating offers exceptional fire protection for solid wood and steel. This work provides a bioinspired strategy for creating cost-effective fire-retardant coatings for diverse industrial applications and a fire-safe world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available