3.8 Article

Systemic sclerosis complicated by chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension treated with balloon pulmonary angioplasty: a case report

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac080

Keywords

Pulmonary hypertension; Systemic sclerosis; Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; Balloon pulmonary angioplasty; Case report

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This case report describes a rare case of SSc complicated by CTEPH and treated with BPA. Patients with SSc are prone to complications of various types of PH, highlighting the importance of distinguishing CTEPH for treatment choices and prognosis.
Background Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is known to induce pulmonary hypertension (PH), resulting in poor prognosis. Pulmonary hypertension secondary to connective tissue disease is usually classified as Group 1. In patients with SSc, PH owing to left heart failure (Group 2) and interstitial pneumonia (Group 3) are also known; however, there have been limited reports on chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH), which corresponds to Group 4. Case summary A 39-year-old female with SSc was admitted with shortness of breath on exertion for the past 4 months. Right heart catheterization revealed severe PH. Group 1 PH secondary to collagen tissue disease was suspected; however, thoracic computed tomography and lung perfusion scan led to the diagnosis of CTEPH of Group 4. We treated the PH with several medications and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), which improved the PH and right heart failure. Consequently, her overall condition also improved. Discussion This is a rare case report of SSc complicated by CTEPH, which was treated with BPA. Patients with SSc are prone to complications of various type of PH. Thus, it is important to distinguish CTEPH in terms of treatment choice and prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available