4.6 Article

Dimensionally stable multication-crosslinked poly(arylene piperidinium) membranes for water electrolysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 10, Issue 15, Pages 8401-8412

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta10820d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [016.160.312]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By introducing a multication crosslinker, crosslinked poly(arylene piperidinium)-based AEMs with efficient ion conducting pathways were successfully fabricated, improving both the conductivity and dimensional stability. Alkaline water electrolysis experiments demonstrated the great potential of multication crosslinked AEMs in this field.
Cross-linking is a widely employed process to improve the dimensional stability of anion exchange membranes (AEMs). However, crosslinking often comes at the expense of ion exchange capacity and ionic conductivity. To address this trade-off problem, we introduce a multication crosslinker composed of two piperidinium groups and a flexible alkyl chain to fabricate novel crosslinked poly(arylene piperidinium)-based AEMs (C-IL-x). It is found that multication crosslinkers can promote the fabrication of micro-phase separated morphology and construct highly efficient ion conducting pathways inside the membrane. Compared to the non-crosslinked AEM, the conductivity and dimensional stability of crosslinked C-IL-x AEMs were improved simultaneously. The highest ionic conductivity of the crosslinked C-IL-x AEMs reaches up to 95 mS cm(-2) at 80 degrees C. In addition, alkaline water electrolysis using the C-IL-100 AEM (100 refers to the expected crosslinking degree) exhibits a high current density of 880 mA cm(-2) at 2.2 V in 1 M KOH solution with Ni-based catalysts, which confirms that multication crosslinked AEMs are promising for application in alkaline water electrolysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available