4.3 Article

Adenosquamous carcinoma of pancreas: CT and MR imaging features in eight patients, with pathologic correlations and comparison with adenocarcinoma of pancreas

Journal

ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 508-520

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0616-4

Keywords

Invasive ductal adenocarcinoma; Adenosquamous carcinoma; CT; MR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To reveal the CT and MR imaging features of adenosquamous carcinoma of pancreas (ASqC) in eight patients. This study was approved by our institutional review board. Eight patients with ASqC were included in this study. Radiologic and pathologic findings were reviewed in each lesion. Additionally, radiologic imaging findings were compared between ASqC and controlled adenocarcinoma groups. Significant differences between ASqC and adenocarcinoma groups were noted in lesion shape, enhancement pattern on dynamic CT images, the presence or absence of necrosis, and tumor thrombus in the portal vein (PV) system. Compared with adenocarcinoma, ASqC tended to be round-lobulated shape (100% vs. 57.6%), have necrotic portions (100% vs. 39.4%), and have tumor thrombus in the PV system (37.5% vs. 6.1%). Extensive central necrosis was found in six (75%) of ASqC lesions. More lesions in ASqC group (62.5% vs. 12.1%) showed the highest absolute attenuation on pancreatic arterial phase (PAP) or portal venous phase (PVP) images, although the average attenuation values of all ASqC lesions on PAP, PVP, and delayed phase images were almost the same. Five (83.3%) of six resected lesions appeared as nodular type macroscopically. Microscopically, all lesions did not show infiltrating growth pattern, but showed an intermediate growth pattern, and were surrounded incompletely by fibrous tissue. ASqC tended to be a round-lobulated lesion with extensive central necrosis. Additionally, tumor thrombus in the PV system was often present. These CT and MR imaging features could be a useful clue for diagnosing ASqC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available