4.6 Article

Hierarchical Morphology-Dependent Gas-Sensing Performances of Three-Dimensional SnO2 Nanostructures

Journal

ACS SENSORS
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 102-110

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.6b00597

Keywords

hierarchical nanostructure; gas-sensing performance; SnO2; volatile organic compounds; surface-engineering strategy

Funding

  1. National Key Scientific Program-Nanoscience and Nanotechnology [2013CB934304]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61474122, 61573334, 31571567, 61106012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hierarchical morphology-dependent gas-sensing performances have been demonstrated for three-dimensional SnO2 nanostructures. First, hierarchical SnO2 nanostructures assembled with ultrathin shuttle-shaped nanosheets have been synthesized via a facile and one-step hydrothermal approach. Due to thermal instability of hierarchical nanosheets, they are gradually shrunk into cone-shaped nanostructures and finally deduced into rod shaped ones under a thermal treatment. Given the intrinsic advantages of three-dimensional hierarchical nanostructures, their gas-sensing properties have been further explored. The results indicate that their sensing behaviors are greatly related with their hierarchical morphologies. Among the achieved hierarchical morphologies, three-dimensional cone-shaped hierarchical SnO2 nanostructures display the highest relative response up to about 175 toward 100 ppm of acetone as an example. Furthermore, they also exhibit good sensing responses toward other typical volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Microstructured analyses suggest that these results are mainly ascribed to the formation of more active surface defects and mismatches for the cone-shaped hierarchical nanostructures during the process of thermal recrystallization. Promisingly, this surface-engineering strategy can be extended to prepare other three-dimensional metal oxide hierarchical nanostructures with good gas-sensing performances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available