4.5 Article

Landscape appreciation of systematic structure properties in even-even nuclei along the valley of stability

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.014329

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11975209, U2032211, 12075287]
  2. Physics Research and Development Program of Zhengzhou University [32410017]
  3. Project of Youth Backbone Teachers of Colleges and Universities of Henan Province [2017GGJS008]
  4. Polish National Science Centre [2016/21/B/ST2/01227]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structural properties of even-even nuclei along the beta-stability line are comprehensively analyzed using an improved potential-energy-surface approach. The study reveals regularities in the equilibrium deformations and two-nucleon separation energies, providing valuable insights into the behavior of these nuclei.
The structural properties of even-even nuclei along the beta-stability line are systematically analyzed and investigated by means of our improved potential-energy-surface (PES) approach. The equilibrium deformations obtained from the PES minima are compared with available experimental data and other theoretical results. From a different viewpoint, taking the nuclei on the stability line as footholds, we systematically present two-nucleon separation energies and half-lives in the corresponding isotopic chains. Very regular laws can be seen, especially below Z = 84. The observed trends and anomalous behavior are briefly discussed. The energy difference between theory and experiment for the binding energies and two-nucleon separation energies indicates that the improved PES calculations with our fitting macroscopic model parameters are relatively in better agreement with experiments. Based on the systematic law of two-nucleon separation energies, the bound limit of even-even nuclei is crudely estimated along the stability line.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available