4.6 Review

Versatile subtypes of pericytes and their roles in spinal cord injury repair, bone development and repair

Journal

BONE RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41413-022-00203-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Funding of China [82172424, 81972150, 82172428]
  2. Zhejiang Medical and Health Science, and Technology Plan Project [2021KY212]
  3. Australian Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1107828]
  4. Wenzhou Medical University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vascular regeneration and bone development rely on the important role of pericytes, but distinguishing different subtypes of pericytes remains a challenge. This review discusses the biology, markers, and differentiation capacity of pericytes, with a focus on their potential applications in the treatment of spinal cord injury and bone diseases in orthopedics.
Vascular regeneration is a challenging topic in tissue repair. As one of the important components of the neurovascular unit (NVU), pericytes play an essential role in the maintenance of the vascular network of the spinal cord. To date, subtypes of pericytes have been identified by various markers, namely the PDGFR-beta, Desmin, CD146, and NG2, each of which is involved with spinal cord injury (SCI) repair. In addition, pericytes may act as a stem cell source that is important for bone development and regeneration, whilst specific subtypes of pericyte could facilitate bone fracture and defect repair. One of the major challenges of pericyte biology is to determine the specific markers that would clearly distinguish the different subtypes of pericytes, and to develop efficient approaches to isolate and propagate pericytes. In this review, we discuss the biology and roles of pericytes, their markers for identification, and cell differentiation capacity with a focus on the potential application in the treatment of SCI and bone diseases in orthopedics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available