3.8 Proceedings Paper

Novel Environmentally Friendly Leaching Process for Vanadium and Tungsten Recovery from Spent SCR Catalyst

Journal

RARE METAL TECHNOLOGY 2022
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 111-117

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-92662-5_11

Keywords

SCR catalyst; Vanadium; Tungsten; Leaching; De-silication

Funding

  1. R&D Center forValuable Recycling (GlobalTop R&D Program) of the Ministry of Environment, Korea [2019002230001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is the best technology for reducing nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions in industries. The disposal of deactivated SCR catalysts in landfills poses a significant environmental issue, making the recovery of vanadium and tungsten a major motivation for this research. Through investigating the soda roasting process and water leaching, it was found that the optimal parameters can reduce roasting temperature, leaching time, and impurities leached with the metals.
Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is the best technology to reduce the nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions in industries. Due to the increasing demand and the limited lifespan of them, after deactivation, they usually end up in landfills posing a major environmental issue. Most catalysts for stationary applications contain around 0.5-1.5% wt V2O5 and 7-10% wt of WO3 in a TiO2 glass fiber matrix and considering the necessity of replacing primary with secondary sources makes the recovery of vanadium and tungsten a major motivation for this research. During this investigation, spent SCR catalyst soda roasting process with dissolved NaOH compared with the traditional NaOH dry roasting and its influence in the subsequent water leaching was studied. With the ideal parameters obtained after optimization, there is a reduction of roasting temperature, leaching time, and the amount of silicon impurities leached alongside the title metals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available