4.6 Article

Potentiodynamic polarization curves of AA7075 at high scan rates interpreted using the high field model

Journal

NPJ MATERIALS DEGRADATION
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41529-022-00227-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NRC's METALTec industrial research group
  2. Centre quebecois de recherche et de developpement de l'aluminium (CQRDA)
  3. Canadian Office for Energy Research and Development (OERD)
  4. [G234176 NSERC RGPIN-2020-04609]
  5. [G248536 CQRDA/NRC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The drastic distortion of potentiodynamic polarization curves at high scan rates makes it difficult to extract accurate kinetic parameters. Contrary to previous studies, the high field model successfully explains the features of experimental curves and the changing kinetics with scan rates, electrolytes, and measurement locations.
The drastic distortion of potentiodynamic polarization curves measured at high potential scan rates prevents the extraction of accurate kinetic parameters. In this work, we start by measuring potentiodynamic polarization curves of AA7075 at scan rates ranging from 0.167 mV center dot s(-1) to 100 mV center dot s(-1), in an acidic 0.62 M NaH2PO4 solution and a near-neutral 3.5 wt% NaCl solution. Changes in potentiodynamic polarization curves are observed not only at different scan rates and electrolytes but also between replicated experiments. Contrary to what was reported in previous studies, the disturbance of charging current associated with high scan rates does not satisfactorily explain the potentiodynamic polarization shape. Instead, the high field model that incorporates the kinetics of anodic oxide growth successfully captures the features of experimental potentiodynamic polarization curves. Compared to Tafel's theory, the high field model explains remarkably the changing kinetics with scan rates, electrolytes, and the variance between measurements performed at different sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available