4.7 Article

SARS-CoV-2 Period Seroprevalence and Related Factors, Hillsborough County, Florida, USA, October 2020-March 2021

Journal

EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 556-563

Publisher

CENTERS DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION
DOI: 10.3201/eid2803.211495

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chemical Biology Core
  2. Participant Research, Interventions, and Measurement Core
  3. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource Core at Moffitt Cancer Center
  4. Moffitt's Cancer Center Support Grant [P30CA076292]
  5. Moffitt Foundation
  6. Investigator-Initiated Studies Program of Merck Sharp Dohme Corp
  7. Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance at the National Institutes of Health's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [HHSN272201400008C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study estimated the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among residents of Hillsborough County, Florida, and found that factors related to social distancing were associated with infection rate, regardless of the time since infection.
Estimating the actual extent of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic is challenging because virus test positivity data undercount the actual number and proportion of persons infected. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence is a marker of past SARS-CoV-2 infection regardless of presence or severity of symptoms and therefore is a robust biomarker of infection period prevalence. We estimated SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among residents of Hillsborough County, Florida, USA, to determine factors independently associated with SARS-CoV-2 antibody status overall and among asymptomatic antibody-positive persons. Among 867 participants, SARS-CoV-2 period prevalence (October 2020-March 2021) was 19.5% (asymptomatic seroprevalence was 8%). Seroprevalence was 2-fold higher than reported SARS-CoV-2 virus test positivity. Factors related to social distancing (e.g., essential worker status, not practicing social distancing, contact with a virus-positive person, and length of contact exposure time) were consistently associated with seroprevalence but did not differ by time since suspected or known infection (<6 months vs. >= 6 months).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available