4.6 Review

Double network hydrogels for energy/environmental applications: challenges and opportunities

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 10, Issue 17, Pages 9215-9247

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta00540a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21777118, 21406097]
  2. Double Thousand Plan Project of Jiangxi Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Double network (DN) hydrogels have thrived as smart soft materials since their advent nearly 20 years ago. Their unique structures and adjustable crosslinking methods overcome the limitations of single network hydrogels in terms of mechanical properties. DN hydrogels with remarkable mechanical properties, excellent hydrophilicity, fast self-healing, high conductivity, and rapid stimulus responsiveness are considered promising candidates for energy and environmental applications.
Since the advent of double network (DN) hydrogels nearly 20 years ago, they have flourished as smart soft materials. Their two unique contrasting interpenetrating network structures and adjustable network crosslinking methods overcome the obstacles of single network hydrogels in mechanical properties. Thus, DN hydrogels with remarkable mechanical properties, excellent hydrophilicity, fast self-healing, high conductivity, and rapid stimulus responsiveness have been considered candidates for energy and environmental applications. In this review, we classify these types of hydrogels according to their components and discuss the most contemporary trends in their preparation methods, network structures, mechanical features, and self-healing mechanisms. Besides, we provide the future perspectives of DN hydrogels for energy applications, covering supercapacitors and batteries, and environmental applications including adsorption, solar interface evaporation, and catalytic degradation, and discuss some potential future directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available