4.6 Article

Nanoceramic Composites for Nuclear Radiation Attenuation

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15010262

Keywords

lead oxide; radiation shielding; cement composites; gamma attenuation; flexure strength; deflection

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [RGP.2/58/42]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the radiation shielding capacity and mechanical properties of ceramic composites reinforced with lead oxide nano-powder. The optimal percentage of added nano-lead oxide in the cement was determined to be 0.6 wt.% for achieving enhanced properties and cost-effectiveness.
The development of radiation attenuation materials with lean cross-sections is the need of the hour. However, the inherent threat of radiations accompanying these processes is of major concern. Thus, in an attempt to shield unnecessary radiations, several novel materials have been fabricated alongside the conventional materials available. Yet, there is a need for cost-effective, efficient shielding materials that have good mechanical strength and effective shielding properties. The present work investigates ceramic composite behaviors and radiation shielding capacity reinforced with lead oxide nano-powder. Developed nano-lead-based cement composites were subjected to mechanical tests to determine flexural and compressive strengths to check their suitability for structural applications. Further, the gamma attenuation test of the composites was conducted to determine their neutron absorption capacity. The addition of nano-leadoxide in the control beams was varied from 0.7 to 0.95 and 1 wt.% of the ceramic matrix. The percentage of nano-leadoxide that gives the best results in both enhanced properties and economic aspects was determined to be 0.6 wt.% of the cement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available