4.4 Article

Effect of (κ)- and (ι)-Carrageenans on Rheology and Strength Development of Cement-Based Materials

Journal

ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL
Volume 119, Issue 1, Pages 207-220

Publisher

AMER CONCRETE INST
DOI: 10.14359/51734196

Keywords

cement suspensions; compressive strength; hydration kinetics; rheology; viscosity-modifying admixtures; (kappa)-(iota)-carrageenan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of kappa-iota carrageenan on the rheological behavior, hydration kinetics, and strength development of cement-based materials was investigated. The results showed that the addition of kappa-iota carrageenan increased the flowability and structural stability of cement suspensions. However, when combined with high-range water reducer (HRWR), the effect of kappa-iota carrageenan was reduced. Furthermore, the addition of kappa-iota carrageenan delayed the hardening time of cement suspensions, but had no significant impact on early-age compressive strength development.
The effect of kappa (kappa)-iota (iota)-carrageenan used in combination with two different types of high-range water reducer (HRWR) on the rheological behavior, hydration kinetics, and strength development of cement-based materials was evaluated. The use of (kappa)-(iota)-carrageenan increased the yield stress, plastic viscosity, rigidity, and structural buildup kinetics of cement suspensions. However, the combined addition of (kappa)-(iota)-carrageenan with HRWR reduced the yield stress and plastic viscosity. Although the addition of (kappa)-(iota)-carrageenan extended the dormant period of cement suspension, (kappa)-(iota)-carrageenan did not significantly affect early-age compressive strength development. Compared to (kappa)-carrageenan, the use of the (kappa)-(iota)-carrageenan combination reduced the dormant period of cement suspensions by approximately 50%, resulting in a 50% increase of compressive strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available