3.8 Proceedings Paper

Computing Envy-Freeable Allocations with Limited Subsidies

Journal

WEB AND INTERNET ECONOMICS, WINE 2021
Volume 13112, Issue -, Pages 522-539

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-94676-0_29

Keywords

Fair division; Indivisible goods; Subsidy minimization; Approximation algorithms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The problem of minimizing subsidies for envy-freeness is a challenging task, with recent research focusing on designing approximation algorithms due to its NP-hard nature. While for a small number of agents, it is possible to approximate the minimum subsidy amount with a graceful increase in running time, for a superconstant number of agents, both exact computation and approximation are difficult.
Fair division has emerged as a very hot topic in EconCS research, and envy-freeness is among the most compelling fairness concepts. An allocation of indivisible items to agents is envy-free if no agent prefers the bundle of any other agent to his own in terms of value. As envy-freeness is rarely a feasible goal, there is a recent focus on relaxations of its definition. An approach in this direction is to complement allocations with payments (or subsidies) to the agents. A feasible goal then is to achieve envy-freeness in terms of the total value an agent gets from the allocation and the subsidies. We consider the natural optimization problem of computing allocations that are envy-freeable using the minimum amount of subsidies. As the problem is NP-hard, we focus on the design of approximation algorithms. On the positive side, we present an algorithm which, for a constant number of agents, approximates the minimum amount of subsidies within any required accuracy, at the expense of a graceful increase in the running time. On the negative side, we show that, for a superconstant number of agents, the problem of minimizing subsidies for envy-freeness is not only hard to compute exactly (as a folklore argument shows) but also, more importantly, hard to approximate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available