3.8 Proceedings Paper

Detecting Impulsive Movements to Increase Operators' Safety in Manufacturing

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87383-7_19

Keywords

SDG9; Safety risks; Safety workplace; Reaching task; Unexpected gestures; Human-robot collaboration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identifies impulsive movements during human-robot interaction by using an inertial sensor and calculating four features based on gesture kinematics. The results show that calculating the features with shorter epoch duration improves the detection of impulsive gestures.
Interaction and collaboration of human and robot is becoming a quite common scenario, in manufacturing production. When an operator works with a robot, usually, controlled and predicable movements are used. However, the operator could execute unexpected impulsive movements, which may induce risks for his safety. The purpose of this methodological study is to identify such impulsive movements, by using an inertial sensor fixed on the wrist and by four features calculated on the gesture kinematics. The features were calculated on the measured linear acceleration and on the jerk using two epoch durations (100 ms and 250 ms). Then, features threshold that allow impulsive movements onset identification were evaluated. Results showed that the four features overall recognized impulsive movements during reaching task executed with different directions and cadences. Results showed also that calculating the features with shorter epoch duration gave better results compared to longer epoch duration. A combination of the four features calculated on short epoch duration would increase impulsive gesture detection, reducing occurrence of false positive. In conclusion, this methodology seems suitable to detect impulsive gestures and to intervene promptly with safety measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available