4.0 Review

Olfactory nerve: from ugly duckling to swan

Journal

ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages 75-83

Publisher

ASSOC ARQUIVOS NEURO- PSIQUIATRIA
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0529

Keywords

Clinical Neurology; Smell; Infectious Disease; Olfactory Nerve

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the importance of clinical examination of the olfactory nerve, highlighting its value and role in the diagnosis of diseases such as COVID-19 infection. By analyzing a large number of literature, practical techniques and clinical tips for assessing the olfactory system are provided, which may be valuable to clinicians.
Background: The olfactory nerve has never been the shining star of neurological examination. Quite the contrary, examining the first cranial nerve is often an overlooked step. As cases of anosmia secondary to COVID-19 infection continue to rise, the 2020 pandemic has shed new light on this much-forgotten nerve, its value as an aid to diagnosis of several diseases and its central role in our daily lives. Objective: We aimed to emphasize how essential and simple clinical examination of the olfactory system can be by highlighting practical techniques and clinical tips for its assessment. We also share pearls and pitfalls in localization and differential diagnosis, which may prove valuable to busy clinicians. Methods: A broad review of the literature was conducted by searching PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar for articles and books containing topics regarding examination of the olfactory nerve and its anatomy, physiology and pathology. No particular inclusion or exclusion criteria were used. Results: Forty different works were found, between books and articles, from which 20 were selected after careful analysis. Conclusions: Despite the tragedy and adversity that followed the COVID-19 pandemic, its legacy has taught us a crystalclear lesson: olfaction should no longer be neglected in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available