4.5 Review

Centralized and distributed hydrogen production using steam reforming: challenges and perspectives

Journal

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages 1923-1939

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1se01870a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning [20193510100040]
  2. Institute of Engineering Research at Seoul National University
  3. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation & Planning (KETEP) [20193510100040] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this review, the centralized and distributed SMR processes for both large- and small-scale hydrogen production are summarized, and practical issues are presented. This review is of great significance for the promotion of decentralized SMR-based hydrogen production systems.
Steam methane reforming (SMR) has been adopted for the mass production of hydrogen that has been actively used in various industrial processes for several decades. Currently, the demand for hydrogen for small-scale domestic and vehicular applications is growing rapidly. Although essential technical elements are similar at the industrial and retail levels, large-scale centralized SMR techniques do not apply to small-scale distributed SMR systems owing to the difference in their production capacity and purposes. In this review, we summarize the state-of-the-art centralized and distributed SMR processes for large- and small-scale hydrogen production. No review has been reported on the differences and difficulties in SRM technology according to productivity. By categorizing conventional and new technologies and presenting practical issues according to production capacity, this review will contribute to the rapid adoption of decentralized SMR based hydrogen production systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available