3.8 Article

Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio and C-Reactive Protein Combination as the Best Simple Predictor of Treatment Response in Cirrhotic Patients with Culture Negative Neutrocytic Ascites

Journal

MEDICAL BULLETIN OF SISLI ETFAL HOSPITAL
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 77-83

Publisher

KARE PUBL
DOI: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.58219

Keywords

Ascitic fluid infection; cirrhosis; c-reactive protein; culture negative neutrocytic ascites; lymphocyte to monocyte ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated inflammatory markers and found that the combination of LMR and CRP can be used as a novel, low-cost, and non-invasive test to predict treatment response.
Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate the most ideal inflammatory markers for treatment response and to determine a cutoff value that could predict response to treatment for culture negative neutrocytic ascite (CNNA) patients. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional case-controlled study. Patients with CNNA were evaluated by taking ascites fluid sampling at the beginning and on the 5th day of treatment. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio were calculated. Results: Of the 123 cases with cirrhotic ascites disease, 59 were CCNA and 64 were the control group without ascite-fluid infection. There were statistically significant differences for blood monocyte count, NLR (p<0.01), LMR, and C-reactive protein (CRP) (p<0.001) between two groups. Patients in the CNNA group were compared before and after treatment among themselves for the treatment response. There was statistically significant difference in mean platelet volume, monocyte, LMR, and CRP (p<0.05) between two groups. After receiver operator characteristics curve analysis, the best cutoff value for monocyte was <0.64 x 10(3)/mu L (sensitivity 49.2%, specificity 74.6%, positive predictive value [PPV] 65.9%, and negative predictive value [NPV] 59.5%) (p<0.01), for LMR was >= 1.7 (sensitivity 76.3%, specificity 78%, PPV 77.6%, and NPV 76.7%), and for CRP was 18 mg/L (sensitivity 91.5% specificity 57.6%, PPV 68.4%, and NPV 87.2%) (p<0.001). When LMR and CRP were used together, sensitivity (86.5%), specificity (83.1%), PPV (83.6%), and NPV (86%) were found to be statistically significantly higher (p<0.001). Conclusion: Our results showed that in cirrhotic patients with CNNA, combined LMR + CRP can be used as a novel, low cost and non-invasive test to predict treatment response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available