4.2 Article

Did the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Reduce Readmissions without Hurting Patient Outcomes at High Dual-Proportion Hospitals Prior to Stratification?

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00469580211064836

Keywords

readmissions; safety-net hospitals; hospital penalties; dual eligible Medicare beneficiaries; Medicare policy

Funding

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R01 AG054708-01]
  2. National Institute of Aging [R01AG046838]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that high dual-proportion hospitals reduced readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia patients, while patients' health outcomes remained stable. Although high dual-proportion hospitals reduced readmissions more for heart failure patients compared to low dual-proportion hospitals, there was a relative increase in mortality.
Since the implementation of Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), safety-net hospitals have received a disproportionate share of financial penalties for excess readmissions, raising concerns about the fairness of the policy. In response, the HRRP now stratifies hospitals into five quintiles by low-income Medicare (dual Medicare-Medicaid eligible) stay proportion and compares readmission rates within quintiles. To better understand the potential effects of the revised policy, we used difference-in-differences models to compare changes in 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, and 90th-day community-dwelling rates after discharge of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure and pneumonia during 2007-2014, for hospitals in the highest (N = 677) and lowest (N = 678) dual-proportion quintiles before and after the original HRRP implementation in fiscal year 2013. We find that high dual-proportion hospitals lowered readmissions for all three conditions, while their patients' health outcomes remained largely stable. We also find that for heart failure, high dual-proportion hospitals reduced readmissions more than low dual-proportion hospitals, albeit with a relative increase in mortality. Contrary to concerns about fairness, our findings imply that, under the original HRRP, high dual-proportion hospitals improved readmissions performance generally without adverse effects on patients' health. Whether these gains could be retained under the new policy should be closely monitored.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available