4.7 Article

Comparison between Germinated Seed and Isolated Microspore EMS Mutagenesis in Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis)

Journal

HORTICULTURAE
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae8030232

Keywords

Chinese cabbage; EMS; mutagenesis; isolated microspore culture; mutants

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972405]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of EMS mutagenesis on generating mutants in Chinese cabbage using two approaches. It was found that seed EMS mutagenesis had a higher mutation frequency and was more suitable for generating a large-scale mutant library, while microspore EMS mutagenesis was conducive to rapidly obtaining homozygous mutants.
Mutagenesis is an important tool for breeding and genomic research. In this study, the germinated seeds and isolated microspores of a double haploid line 'FT' were treated with EMS, respectively, with the aim of comparing the effects of the two approaches on generating mutants in Chinese cabbage. For microspore EMS mutagenesis, the isolated microspores were treated with 0.12% EMS for 20 min, a total of 1268 plantlets were obtained, and 15 M-1 mutants were screened with a mutation frequency of 1.2%. For seed EMS mutagenesis, 7800 germinated seeds were treated with 0.8% EMS for 12 h, and a total of 701 M-2 mutants were screened, with a mutation frequency of 18.78%. In total, 716 mutants with heritable morphological variation including leaf color, leaf shape, leafy head, bolting, and fertility, were obtained from the EMS mutagenesis experiments. Homozygous mutant plants could be screened from M-1 lines by microspore mutagenesis, and M-2 lines by seed mutagenesis. The mutation frequency was higher in seed mutagenesis than in microspore mutagenesis. Based on these results, we propose that seed EMS mutagenesis is more suitable to generate a large-scale mutant library, and the microspore EMS mutagenesis is conducive to rapidly obtaining homozygous mutants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available