4.2 Article

The echocardiographic course of pretransplant pulmonary hypertension following kidney transplantation and associated outcomes

Journal

PULMONARY CIRCULATION
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pul2.12030

Keywords

diastolic dysfunction; graft loss; survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reviewed the pre- and post-transplant status of 115 kidney transplant patients with echocardiographically-defined pulmonary hypertension. The results showed that although some patients showed improvement in pulmonary hypertension after transplantation, there was no clear association between the improvement and patient outcomes.
The post 3 kidney transplant course of pretransplant echocardiographically-defined pulmonary hypertension (PH) was reviewed in 115 patients. Of these 61 patients (the largest cohort reported to date), underwent 160 for indication echocardiograms posttransplant (mean echocardiograms per patient: 2.6 +/- 2.3). Patients undergoing posttransplant echocardiograms demonstrated greater risks for worse outcomes than those without posttransplant echocardiograms; however, there was no difference in mortality, death-censored graft failure or the composite of death or graft failure between these two groups. Of patients tested, 36 (59%) showed resolution of PH at a median of 37.5 months. Six patients (16.7%) in whom PH resolved (at a median of 29 months), experienced recurrence of PH after an interval of 48 months. No pretransplant demographic or echocardiographic characteristics distinguished those in whom PH persisted versus resolved. Though there was no difference in the risk for mortality or death-censored graft loss between the two groups at 3 and 5 years, there was a higher risk for the composite of mortality or graft loss at three but not at five years in the group with persistent PH. In conclusion, echocardiographically defined PH resolved in 59% of patients following kidney transplantation; but irrespective of resolution there was no clear association with worse outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available