Journal
RMD OPEN
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002049
Keywords
Arthritis; Psoriatic; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Spondylitis; Ankylosing
Categories
Funding
- AbbVie
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The effect of upadacitinib on pain outcomes in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) was evaluated in three randomized trials. The results showed that a higher proportion of patients receiving upadacitinib achieved significant pain reduction as early as week 2, and these improvements were sustained or increased over one year.
Objective Evaluate the effect of upadacitinib on pain outcomes in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) across 3 randomised trials (SELECT-PsA 1 and 2 for PsA; SELECT-AXIS 1 for AS). Methods Patients were randomised to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or placebo (all 3 studies), or adalimumab 40 mg every other week (SELECT-PsA 1 only). Pain outcomes included proportion of patients achieving >= 30%, >= 50% and >= 70% reduction from baseline in patient global assessment of pain and other end points. Results A higher proportion of patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo achieved >= 30%, >= 50% and >= 70% reduction in pain end points as early as week 2; these improvements with upadacitinib were generally sustained or increased through year 1 (PsA 1/2 studies: 64%/48%, 58%/42% and 38%/22%, respectively; SELECT-AXIS 1 study: 76%, 72% and 54%). Results were similar with adalimumab in PsA 1 (59%, 49% and 32%). Patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib 15 mg were able to reach a similar level of improvement as the continuous upadacitinib groups by year 1 (PsA 1/2 studies: 46%-60%, 35%-49% and 15%-34%; AS study: 83%, 72% and 46%). Results were similar with other pain end points. Conclusion Rapid and sustained improvements in pain outcomes across several end points were consistently shown with upadacitinib over 1 year in patients with active PsA or AS who had either inadequate response to prior non-biologic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (PsA studies) or were biologic-naive with inadequate response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (AS study).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available