3.8 Article

Unexpected Vection Exacerbates Cybersickness During HMD-Based Virtual Reality

Journal

FRONTIERS IN VIRTUAL REALITY
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/frvir.2022.860919

Keywords

cybersickness; motion sickness; virtual reality; head-mounted display (HMD); vection

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project [DP210101475]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the possibility that unexpected visual-induced illusions of self-motion can cause cybersickness. The results showed that unexpected vection is the most important predictor of cybersickness, suggesting that developers should ensure that simulated self-motions are expected and perceived to be under user control in order to safely enhance experiences in HMD VR.
Visually induced illusions of self-motion (vection) are thought to cause cybersickness during head-mounted display based virtual reality (HMD VR). However, the empirical support for this widespread belief is rather mixed. Our exploratory study examined the possibility that only unexpected experiences of vection provoke cybersickness. Fifteen males and 15 females played an HMD VR game (Mission: ISS) for up to 14 min with: 1) their experiences of vection and cybersickness assessed every 2 minutes; and 2) the game being terminated whenever they reported feeling sick. Of the 30 participants tested, 17 reported feeling sick and 13 remained well. Sick and well participants did not differ in terms of the strength of their vection experiences. However, the sick participants were significantly more likely to report unexpected/uncontrolled vection. When these data were subjected to machine learning analysis, unexpected vection was found to be the most important predictor of cybersickness. These preliminary findings suggest that vection can be used to safely enhance experiences in HMD VR-as long as developers ensure that any simulated self-motions are expected and perceived to be under the user's control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available