4.4 Article

Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer

Journal

CURRENT ONCOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 1773-1795

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030146

Keywords

colorectal cancer; artificial intelligence; machine learning; deep learning; diagnosis; prognosis; treatment; screening

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71661167005]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province [2021YFS0112]
  3. Technological Innovation Research and Development Project of Chengdu [2021-YF05-01214-SN]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the research progress and clinical application value of artificial intelligence technologies in the screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of colorectal cancer. The limitations and challenges in the clinical implementation of AI are also discussed.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Accurate early detection and diagnosis, comprehensive assessment of treatment response, and precise prediction of prognosis are essential to improve the patients' survival rate. In recent years, due to the explosion of clinical and omics data, and groundbreaking research in machine learning, artificial intelligence (AI) has shown a great application potential in clinical field of CRC, providing new auxiliary approaches for clinicians to identify high-risk patients, select precise and personalized treatment plans, as well as to predict prognoses. This review comprehensively analyzes and summarizes the research progress and clinical application value of AI technologies in CRC screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, demonstrating the current status of the AI in the main clinical stages. The limitations, challenges, and future perspectives in the clinical implementation of AI are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available