4.7 Article

Soilless Tomato Production: Effects of Hemp Fiber and Rock Wool Growing Media on Yield, Secondary Metabolites, Substrate Characteristics and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Journal

HORTICULTURAE
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae8030272

Keywords

greenhouse gases; greenhouse; organic substrates; carotenoids; phenolic compounds; carbon dioxide; nitrous oxide; methane; N2O; CH4

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) based on the decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) [281B203516, 281B204116]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of hemp fibers as an organic alternative to rock wool in hydroponics cultivation showed similar results in terms of plant growth and fruit quality. However, hemp fibers resulted in higher greenhouse gas emissions, making it less environmentally friendly compared to rock wool.
Replacement of rock wool by organic substrates is considered to reduce the environmental impact, e.g., through energy savings during production and waste prevention, caused by hydroponically produced crops. A suitable substrate for plant production is characterized by an optimal composition of air- and water-filled pores. In our study, we used hemp fibers as an organic alternative to rock wool in order to cultivate tomato plants in hydroponics for 36 weeks. The leaf area, plant length, and yields, as well as the quality of fruits including soluble solid contents, dry weight content, mineral composition, and contents of phenolic compounds caused by both substrates, were similar. Carotenoids were significantly increased in fruits from plants grown in hemp at some measuring dates. Nevertheless, higher emission rates of greenhouse gases such as N2O, CO2, and CH4 caused by hemp fiber compared to those emitted by rock wool during use are rather disadvantageous for the environment. While hemp proved to be a suitable substrate in terms of some physical properties (total pore volume, bulk density), a lower volume of air and easily available water as well as very rapid microbial decomposition and the associated high nitrogen immobilization must be considered as disadvantages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available