4.6 Article

Fostering the Resiliency of Urban Landscape through the Sustainable Spatial Planning of Green Spaces

Journal

LAND
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land11030367

Keywords

urban green areas; green connectivity index; landscape services; urban spatial planning

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research (MIUR) [F85D18000130001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research identifies knowledge gaps in the field of urban green spaces and maps the Urban Green Index and Urban Landscape Services Index. The results show that some districts are better at providing landscape services, but overall the Urban Green Index is relatively low.
Background: It has been recognized that urban green spaces play a crucial role in providing many landscape services. The research aimed at identifying the main knowledge gaps in this framework and to support urban planning, taking into account the spatial configuration of green areas through a pilot study area, and mapping urban landscape services. Methods: In this research, (1) a systematic review, analyzed through a network analysis; (2) an urban pilot study to map the Urban Green Index and, jointly, the spatial composition and configuration of urban green areas, through the integration of three landscape metrics; and (3) the mapping of Urban Landscape Services Index have been carried out. Results: The 37% of the reviewed articles focused on regulating services, while the network analysis identified four clusters. The total Urban Green Index was 26%, and some districts showed a percentage that surpassed it. The total overall Green Connectivity Index was 21%. Some districts were the best providers of landscape services. Conclusions: This research was in line with the EU Joint Science for Policy Report suggesting giving emphasis to the spatial pattern map of green spaces in European cities to provide spatial data available for decision-makers in relation to GI deployment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available