4.7 Article

A Parallelized Genetic Algorithm to Evaluate Asteroid Impact Missions Using Electric Propulsion

Journal

AEROSPACE
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/aerospace9030116

Keywords

electric propulsion; asteroid mission; genetic algorithm

Funding

  1. NASA Washington Space Grant [NNX15AJ98H S000005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces a streamlined genetic algorithm implemented on a GPU to evaluate low-thrust trajectories of spacecraft propelled by an ion thruster. The results demonstrate the utility of utilizing the ion thruster to significantly increase impact speed and decrease trip times, as well as the influence of spacecraft design trade-offs on impact speed. The analysis and evaluation indicate the applicability of this model to various spaceflight missions.
A streamlined genetic algorithm was developed and implemented on a GPU to evaluate low-thrust trajectories of spacecraft propelled by an ion thruster. It was then applied to examine the utility of a specific thruster for an asteroid impact mission. This method was validated by comparing impact speeds of non-thruster results with the DART mission, which does not significantly use the equipped ion thruster. Then, by utilizing the ion thruster for prolonged periods, this model demonstrated the possibility of significant increases in the impact speed and significant decreases in the trip times. This specific test case was used to examine the utility of the model and, by methodically varying relevant variables, this article shows the influence of the genetic algorithm on the results. By examining a range of electrical power levels, the results presented here provide hints as to the possible effects of spacecraft design trade-offs on impact speed. The analysis of the effects of the algorithm on the results and the evaluation of thruster operating parameters indicate the applicability of this model to a variety of spaceflight missions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available