4.7 Article

Phase-field elasticity model based on mechanical jump conditions

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 887-901

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-015-1141-6

Keywords

Phase-field; Elasticity; Jump-conditions; Microstructure evolution; Heterogeneous systems; Interfacial excess energy

Funding

  1. DFG [1483]
  2. state Baden-Wuerttemberg
  3. European Fonds for regional development
  4. Helmholtz Portfolio topic Materials Science for Energy and its Applications in Thin Film Photovoltaics and in Energy Efficiency
  5. center of excellence in Computational Materials Science and Engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computational models based on the phase-field method typically operate on a mesoscopic length scale and resolve structural changes of the material and furthermore provide valuable information about microstructure and mechanical property relations. An accurate calculation of the stresses and mechanical energy at the transition region is therefore indispensable. We derive a quantitative phase-field elasticity model based on force balance and Hadamard jump conditions at the interface. Comparing the simulated stress profiles calculated with Voigt/Taylor (Annalen der Physik 274(12):573, 1889), Reuss/Sachs (Z Angew Math Mech 9:49, 1929) and the proposed model with the theoretically predicted stress fields in a plate with a round inclusion under hydrostatic tension, we show the quantitative characteristics of the model. In order to validate the elastic contribution to the driving force for phase transition, we demonstrate the absence of excess energy, calculated by Durga et al. (Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 21(5):055018, 2013), in a one-dimensional equilibrium condition of serial and parallel material chains. To validate the driving force for systems with curved transition regions, we relate simulations to the Gibbs-Thompson equilibrium condition

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available