4.7 Article

Neural spatio-temporal patterns of information processing related to cognitive conflict and correct or false recognitions

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09141-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Polish National Science Centre - Foundation for Polish Science (FNP) project Bio-inspired Artificial Neural Networks [2013/08/M/HS6/00042, POIR.04.04.00-00-14DE/18-00]
  2. Priority Research Area DigiWorld under the program Excellence Initiative-Research University at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes the dynamics of information processing in a visual short-term memory task from the perspective of neural responses, conflict level, and correctness/erroneous. The results suggest that information processing varies depending on correct or false recognition, with prolonged processing for stimuli inducing high cognitive conflict and erroneous responses.
Using a visual short-term memory task and employing a new methodological approach, we analyzed neural responses from the perspective of the conflict level and correctness/erroneous over a longer time window. Sixty-five participants performed the short-term memory task in the fMRI scanner. We explore neural spatio-temporal patterns of information processing in the context of correct or erroneous response and high or low level of cognitive conflict using classical fMRI analysis, surface-based cortical data, temporal analysis of interpolated mean activations, and machine learning classifiers. Our results provide evidence that information processing dynamics during the retrieval process vary depending on the correct or false recognition-for stimuli inducing a high level of cognitive conflict and erroneous response, information processing is prolonged. The observed phenomenon may be interpreted as the manifestation of the brain's preparation for future goal-directed action.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available