4.7 Article

Ab-Initio Membrane Protein Amphipathic Helix Structure Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2020.3029274

Keywords

Proteins; Biomembranes; Hidden Markov models; Predictive models; Amino acids; Bioinformatics; Databases; Amphipathic helix; membrane protein; bioinformatics; structure prediction; deep learning

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC0910500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61725302, 61671288, 31628003, 62073219]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of ShanghaiMunicipality [17JC1403500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a new deep learning-based prediction model is reported, which accurately predicts the structure of amphipathic helix with high interpretability and generalizability.
Amphipathic helix (AH)features the segregation of polar and nonpolar residues and plays important roles in many membrane-associated biological processes through interacting with both the lipid and the soluble phases. Although the AH structure has been discovered for a long time, few ab initio machine learning-based prediction models have been reported, due to the limited amount of training data. In this study, we report a new deep learning-based prediction model, which is composed of a residual neural network and the uneven-thresholds decision algorithm. It is constructed on 121 membrane proteins, in total 51640 residue samples, which are curated from an up-to-date membrane protein structure database. Through a rigid 10-fold nested cross-validation experiment, we demonstrate that our model can achieve promising predictions and exceed current state-of-the-art approaches in this field. This presents a new avenue for accurately predicting AHs. Analysis on the contribution of the input residues and some cases further reveals the high interpretability and the generalization of our model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available