3.9 Article

Characterization of facial asymmetry phenotypes in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using three-dimensional computed tomography and cluster analysis

Journal

KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 85-101

Publisher

KOREAN ASSOC ORTHODONTISTS
DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2022.52.2.85

Keywords

Facial asymmetry; Class III malocclusion; Cluster analysis

Funding

  1. Korea Health Industry Development Institute - Ministry of Health EE Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI18C1638]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to classify the facial asymmetry (FA) phenotypes in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Using three-dimensional computed tomography, a total of 120 patients who underwent orthognathic surgery were evaluated. The FA phenotypes were classified into five types, and treatment strategies and surgical planning recommendations were proposed accordingly.
Objective: To classify facial asymmetry (FA) phenotypes in adult patients with skeletal Class III (C-III) malocclusion. Methods: A total of 120 C-III patients who underwent orthognathic surgery (OGS) and whose three-dimensional computed tomography images were taken one month prior to OGS were evaluated. Thirty hard tissue landmarks were identified. After measurement of 22 variables, including cant (degrees, mm), shift (mm), and yaw (degrees) of the maxilla, maxillary dentition (Max-dent), mandibular dentition, mandible, and mandibular border (Man-border) and differences in the frontal ramus angle (FRA, degrees) and ramus height (RH, mm), K-means cluster analysis was conducted using three variables (cant in the Max-dent [mm] and shift [mm] and yaw [degrees] in the Man-border). Statistical analyses were conducted to characterize the differences in the FA variables among the clusters. Results: The FA phenotypes were classified into five types: 1) non-asymmetry type (35.8%); 2) maxillary-cant type (14.2%; severe cant of the Max-dent, mild shift of the Man-border); 3) mandibular-shift and yaw type (16.7%; moderate shift and yaw of the Man-border, mild RH-difference); 4) complex type (9.2%; severe cant of the Max-dent, moderate cant, severe shift, and severe yaw of the Man-border, moderate differences in FRA and RH); and 5) maxillary reverse-cant type (24.2%; reverse-cant of the Max-dent). Strategic decompensation by pre-surgical orthodontic treatment and considerations for OGS planning were proposed according to the FA phenotypes. Conclusions: This FA phenotype classification may be an effective tool for differential diagnosis and surgical planning for Class III patients with FA. [Korean J Orthod 2022;52(2):85-101]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available