3.8 Article

Reading Ibadi Women's Legacies through Stone Town's Built Environment

Journal

ISLAMIC AFRICA
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 1-26

Publisher

NORTHWESTERN UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1163/21540993-01201001

Keywords

Ibadis; Zanzibar; Omani diaspora; mosques; tombstones; Muslim women and authority; Islamic FBO; heritage conservation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article delves into how wealthy women in 19th-century Zanzibar used their built legacies to convey piety and authority, focusing on an old Ibadi mosque and a tombstone. Despite limited details of their lives and property in written records, insights into their religious and economic commitments can be gleaned from their legacies and contemporary writings. Additionally, the conservation of historic religious institutions in Zanzibar today relies on collaborations between local family members, state institutions, and transnational faith-based organizations.
This article explores how women of means in nineteenth-century Zanzibar used their built legacies to convey their piety and authority even though they were not active in public religious life. The focus of the study is an old Ibadi mosque named after its founder, Aisha bint Jum`a al-Mughayri, and the tombstone of her younger female relative Muhayra bint Jum`a al-Mughayri. While the details of the two women's lives, works and property do not appear prominently in the written record of Zanzibar, this article asks what we can glean about their religious and economic commitments from the built legacies and religious endowments they left behind, as well as from the writings of their male contemporaries, British colonial officials and their descendants. The article also demonstrates how the conservation and upkeep of historic religious institutions in Zanzibar today depends greatly on collaborations between local family members, state institutions and transnational faith-based organizations (FBO s).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available