Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TAIWAN STUDIES
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 59-85Publisher
BRILL
DOI: 10.1163/24688800-20201135
Keywords
national identity; language policy; education
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper compares language education policies in Taiwan and Mainland China, examining the different meanings of multiculturalism in these political contexts. Despite significant differences in the deployment of multicultural rhetoric, both regions continue to prioritize Mandarin as a central language.
In 2018 the government of the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan elevated certain Chinese languages, Taiwanese Indigenous languages, and Taiwan Sign Language to the status of national languages, seemingly marking the latest stage in an evolution of language education policy away from the long-standing focus on Mandarin. This paper analyses this evolution by comparing approaches to language education policy in contemporary Taiwan with those in the People's Republic of China (PRC). It focuses on how notions of multiculturalism, deployed to legitimate policy, have taken on different meanings in these divergent political contexts. I argue that in both the PRC and Taiwan, multiculturalism primarily signifies symbolic recognition of minority and non-dominant languages, involving limited redistribution of power. The continued centrality of Mandarin reflects the powerful legacy in both the ROC and the PRC of discourses of national identity centred around Han Chineseness, despite significant differences in the deployment of multicultural rhetoric.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available