4.3 Article

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: a primer for radiologists

Journal

ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 3993-4004

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03509-1

Keywords

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasm; Gastric carcinoid; Autoimmune atrophic gastritis; Zollinger-Ellison syndrome; Computed tomography (CT); Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Somatostatin receptor imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms are rare tumors with variable differentiation and malignant potential. They can be categorized into three subtypes, each requiring different diagnostic and management approaches. Understanding the pathophysiology and histologic classifications is crucial for effective imaging, therapy, and prognosis assessment.
Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms are uncommon tumors with variable differentiation and malignant potential. Three main subtypes are recognized: type 1, related to autoimmune atrophic gastritis; type 2, associated with Zollinger-Ellison and MEN1 syndrome; and type 3, sporadic. Although endoscopy alone is often sufficient for diagnosis and management of small, indolent, multifocal type 1 tumors, imaging is essential for evaluation of larger, high-grade, and type 2 and 3 neoplasms. Hypervascular intraluminal gastric masses are typically seen on CT/MRI, with associated perigastric lymphadenopathy and liver metastases in advanced cases. Somatostatin receptor nuclear imaging (such as Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT) may also be used for staging and assessing candidacy for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Radiotracer uptake is more likely in well-differentiated, lower-grade tumors, and less likely in poorly differentiated tumors, for which F-18-FDG-PET/CT may have additional value. Understanding disease pathophysiology and evolving histologic classifications is particularly useful for radiologists, as these influence tumor behavior, preferred imaging, therapy options, and patient prognosis. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available