Journal
BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages 2025-2041Publisher
COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-19-2025-2022
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Academy of Finland [308511]
- Academy of Finland (AKA) [308511, 308511] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Boreal upland forests are usually considered methane sinks, but they can become methane sources during wet seasons. Soil moisture and labile carbon from root exudates are key factors affecting methane production in these forests.
Boreal upland forests are generally considered methane (CH4) sinks due to the predominance of CH4 oxidizing bacteria over the methanogenic archaea. However, boreal upland forests can temporarily act as CH4 sources during wet seasons or years. From a landscape perspective and in annual terms, this source can be significant as weather conditions may cause flooding, which can last a considerable proportion of the active season and because often, the forest coverage within a typical boreal catchment is much higher than that of wetlands. Processes and conditions which change mineral soils from acting as a weak sink to a strong source are not well understood. We measured soil CH4 fluxes from 20 different points from regularly irrigated and control plots during two growing seasons. We also estimated potential CH4 production and oxidation rates in different soil layers and performed a laboratory experiment, where soil microcosms were subjected to different moisture levels and glucose addition simulating the fresh labile carbon (C) source from root exudates. The aim was to find the key controlling factors and conditions for boreal upland soil CH4 production. Probably due to long dry periods in both summers, we did not find occasions of CH4 production following the excess irrigation, with one exception in July 2019 with emission of 18 200 mu g CH4 m(-)(2) h(-1). Otherwise, the soil was always a CH4 sink (median CH 4 uptake rate of 260-290 and 150-170 mu g CH4 m(-)(2) h(-1), in control and irrigated plots, respectively). The median soil CH4 uptake rates at the irrigated plot were 88 % and 50 % lower than at the control plot in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Potential CH4 production rates were highest in the organic layer (0.2-0.6 nmol CH4 g(-1) (d(-1)), but some production was also observed in the leaching layer, whereas in other soil layers, the rates were negligible. Potential CH4 oxidation rates varied mainly within 10-40 nmol CH4 g(-1) (d(-1), except in deep soil and the organic layer in 2019, where potential oxidation rates were almost zero. The laboratory experiment revealed that high soil moisture alone does not turn upland forest soil into a CH(4 )source. However, a simple C source, e.g., substrates coming from root exudates with high moisture, switched the soil into a CH4 source. Our unique study provides new insights into the processes and controlling factors on CH4 production and oxidation, and the resulting net efflux that should be incorporated in process models describing global CH4 cycling.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available