4.7 Article

Study on the Effects of Different Seat and Leg Support Conditions of a Trunk Rehabilitation Robot

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3160188

Keywords

Legged locomotion; Muscles; Foot; Rehabilitation robotics; Protocols; Perturbation methods; Electromyography; Balance rehabilitation; biomechanics; electromyography; rehabilitation robotics; seated balance

Funding

  1. Translational Research Program for Rehabilitation Robots, National Rehabilitation Center [NRCTR-EX18005]
  2. Practical Research and Development Support Program
  3. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [2019M3C1B809079812K]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the effects of different footrest configurations on balance performance, trunk movement, and muscle activation under different seating scenarios. The results suggest that a seat-connected footrest is suitable for balance recovery rehabilitation, while a ground-mounted footrest is suitable for trunk movement-focused rehabilitation. Careful selection of seat and footrest conditions can potentially target specific muscle groups during training.
Performance of trunk rehabilitation exercises while sitting on movable surfaces with feet on the ground can increase trunk and leg muscle activations, and constraining the feet to move with the seat isolates control of the trunk. However, there are no detailed studies on the effects of these different leg supports on the trunk and leg muscle activations under unstable and forcefully perturbed seating conditions. We have recently devised a trunk rehabilitation robot that can generate unstable and forcefully perturbed sitting surfaces, and can be used with ground-mounted or seat-connected footrests. In this study, we have evaluated the differences in balance performance, trunk movement and muscle activation (trunk and legs) of fourteen healthy adults caused by the use of these different footrest configurations under the different seating scenarios. The center of pressure and trunk movement results show that the seat-connected footrest may be a more suitable choice for use in a balance recovery focused rehabilitation protocol, while the ground-mounted footrest may be a more suitable choice for a trunk movement focused rehabilitation protocol. Although it is difficult to make a clear selection between footrests due to the mixed trends observed in the muscle activation results, it appears that the seat-connected footrest may be preferable for use with the unstable seat as it causes greater muscle activations. Furthermore, the results provide limited evidence that targeting of a particular muscle group may be possible through careful selection of the seat and footrest conditions. Therefore, it may be possible to utilize the trunk rehabilitation robot to maximize the training outcomes for a wide range of patients through careful selection of training protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available